There is different character in each rural region which has its own set of opportunities and constraints. Due to the constraints, local leaders should mobilize actors together to build an understanding of how appropriately to find and use the resources. Drawing upon the local leadership and collective action literatures and based on evidence, this paper tries to explore the leadership of places through an examination of the experience of a Wufeng District Famers’ Association in Taichung City, Taiwan, whose purposes are safeguarding farmers’ rights and interests, enhancing farmers’ knowledge and skills, boosting the modernization of agriculture, increasing crop yields, improving farmers’ livelihood and developing rural economy. Whether these purposes can be achieved, the leadership of the director-general is the key to the outcome. In view of the importance of the healthy food supply, the director-general of the Wufeng Famers’ Association mobilizes the farmers to transfer from conventional farming to natural farming. In order to understand the role of leadership in collective action of promoting natural farming, this study takes qualitative research method and proposes three important driving forces that have contributed to the transformation of natural farming: the farmers’ association shapes the vision and plans the incentive mechanism, the agricultural experimentation station provides the cultivation techniques, and the successful mobilization of leaders of the production and marketing group. Some of research findings are:1. the role of leaders serves as essential ‘managers’ and ‘intermediaries’ to initiate and sustain collective action, and 2. the leaders seek for opportunities for resolving the problems facing sustainable development and tackling the challenges of collaborative and uncertain issues, 3. through the promoting of the leaders, the farmland area of natural farming is expanding rather quickly and turn the products of natural farming into high quality wine. The collective action seems successful; nevertheless, the leaders are still needed to cope with challenges from external environment. This paper hopes to share the experiences in Taiwan rural organization, deepen the theoretical dialogue, and extend the network for further social practices.
Published in | Science Innovation (Volume 6, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.si.20180603.14 |
Page(s) | 134-142 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Collective Action, Leadership, Sustainable Development, Natural Farming, Taiwan
[1] | Colbourn P, Thornton I, Lead pollution in agricultural soils[J]. J Soil Sci 1978, 29: 513-526. |
[2] | Ma, LQ, Rao, GN. Chemical Fractionation of Cadmium, Copper, Nickel, and Zinc in Contaminated Soils[J]. J Environ. Qual 1997, 26: 259-264. |
[3] | Devarinti, SR, Natural Farming: Eco-Friendly and Sustainable? [J] Agrotechnology, 2016, 5: 147. doi: 10.4172/2168-9881.1000147,https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/natural-farming-ecofriendly-and-sustainable-2168-9881-1000147.php?aid=80363&view=mobile. |
[4] | Fukuoka, M., The One-Straw Revolution[M]. Rodale Press, Emmaus, 1978. |
[5] | Lazarovits G. Rhizobacteria for improvement of Plant Growth and Establishment[J]. HortScience 1997, 32: 188-192. |
[6] | Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action[M]. Cambridge University Press. 1990. |
[7] | Agrawal, A. Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources[J]. World Development, 2001, 29(10): 1649-1672. |
[8] | Baland, J. M. and Platteau, J. P. Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a role for Rural Communities ? [J] Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1996. |
[9] | Rasmussen, L., Meinzen-Dick, R. Local Organizations for Natural Resource Management: Lessons from Theoretical and Empirical Literature. IFPRI Environment and Production Technology Division Discussion Paper 11[R]. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC. 1995. |
[10] | Markelova, H., Meinzen Dick, R., Hellin, J., Dohrn, S. Collective action for smallholder market access[J]. Food Policy 2009, 34 (1): 7-14. |
[11] | OECD. Providing Agri-Environmental Public Goods through Collection Action[M]. Paris: OECD. 2013. |
[12] | Northouse, P. G. Leadership: Theory and Practice (5th ed.) [M]. Thousand Oaks: Sage. 2010. |
[13] | Lee-Ross, D., & Lashley, C. Entrepreneurship & small business management in the hospitality industry[M]. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. 2009. |
[14] | Pedler, M., Burgoyne, J., & Boydell, T. A manager's guide to leadership: An action learning approach (2nd ed.)[M]. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. 2010. |
[15] | Dwyer, L., & Edwards, D.. Sustainable tourism planning. In J. J. Liburd, & D.Edwards (Eds.), Understanding the sustainable development of tourism[M]. Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers Limited. 2010, 19–44. |
[16] | Richards, G., & Palmer, R. Eventful cities: Cultural management and urban revitalisation[M]. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. 2010. |
[17] | Glowacki L, von Rueden C. Leadership solves collective action problems in small-scale societies[J]. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2015, 370: 20150010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0010. |
[18] | Lobo, I.D., Velez, M. & Puerto, S.,. Leadership, entrepreneurship and collective action: A case study from the Colombian Pacific Region[J]. International Journal of the Commons. 2016, 10(2):982–1012. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.640. |
[19] | Morris, A. and S. Staggenborg. Leadership in Social Movements. In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements[M]. In D. Snow, S. Soule, and H. Kriesi(Eds.), Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 2004:171–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470999103.ch8. |
[20] | Olson, M. The Logic of Collective Action[M]. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 1965 [1971]. |
[21] | Ostrom, E. Public Entrepreneurship: A Case Study in Ground Water Basin Management. Ph.D. Dissertation[D]. University of California–Los Angeles. 1965. |
[22] | Kuhnert, S., An Evolutionary Theory of Collective Action: Schumpeterian Entrepreneurship for the Common Good[J]. Constitutional Political Economy, January 2001, 12(1):13-29. |
[23] | Dacin, T., P. Dacin, and P. Tracey. Social Entrepreneurship: A Critique and Future Directions[J]. Organizations Science 2011, 22(5):1203–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0620. |
[24] | Reid, S.W., A.H. Anglin, J.E. Baur, J.C. Short, M.R. Buckley, Blazing new trails or opportunity lost? Evaluating research at the intersection of leadership and entrepreneurship[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2018, 29 (1): 150-164. |
[25] | Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybridapproach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development[J]. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2006, 5(1): 80–92. Retrieved [2018.03.11] from http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_1/pdf/fereday.pdf. |
[26] | 顏愛靜、林怡利、李宏文、李彥儒、辛韓根、陳錦慧、徐雲振、黃信閔、鄭淑惠、蕭聖澄、廖國柱、謝偉仁,農村心能量∼物豐之鄉[J],農業世界雜誌,2017年11月,411:51-61。 |
[27] | 廖淑娟、蕭至邦,推動社區產業發展策略之探討-以霧峰區舊正社區為例[J],社區發展季刊,2016年6月,154: 171-182。 |
[28] | Nanus, B. Visionary leadership: Creating a compelling sense of direction for your organization[M]. San Francisco, CA.: Jossey-Bass Inc., 1992. |
[29] | Burns, P. Entrepreneurship and small business[M]. Palgrave, Basingstoke, 2001. |
[30] | Haven-Tang, C. and Jones, E. “Local Leadership For Rural Tourism Development: A Case Study of Adventa, Monmouthshire[J]. UK” Tourism Management Perspectives, 2012(4): 28-35. |
[31] | Berson, Y. Berson, N. Halevy, B. Shamir, M. Erez, Leading from different psychological distances: A construal-level perspective on vision communication, goal setting, and follower motivation[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2015, 26 (2): 143-155. |
[32] | 黃景建,台農71號無毒健康香米契作合約書[Z],2015年。 |
[33] | 黃景建,台農71號自然農法香米契作合約書[Z],2016年。 |
[34] | 台灣稻農田,稻種故事-台農71號,PayEasy平台[Z],2015。瀏覽日期:2018/03/18 http://www.payeasy.com.tw/taiwanrice/paddy_cultivar/paddy71.html。 |
[35] | 黃永順,霧峰米採自然農法 水稻變黃金,台灣明鏡新聞網[Z],2016年6月9日。http://www.webnews.tw/。 |
[36] | Davies, A. Local leadership and rural renewal through festival fun: The case of SnowFest[M]. In C. Gibson, & C. Connell (Eds.), Festival places: Revitalising rural Australia. Bristol: Channel View Publications. 2011: 61–73. |
[37] | Bass, B.M. Leadership and performance beyond expectations[M]. New York:The Free Press, 1985. |
[38] | Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Morrman, R. H., &Fetter, R. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on follower’s trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 1990(1): 107-142. |
[39] | Yukl, G. An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 1999(10): 285-305. |
[40] | Klein, H.J., Molloy, J., & Brinsfield, C. Reconceptualizing workplace commitment to redress a stretched construct: Revisiting assumptions and removing confounds[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2012, 37: 130–151. |
APA Style
Aiching Yen. (2018). Leadership, Collective Action in Developing Natural Farming: A Case Study at Wufeng District, Taichung City in Taiwan. Science Innovation, 6(3), 134-142. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20180603.14
ACS Style
Aiching Yen. Leadership, Collective Action in Developing Natural Farming: A Case Study at Wufeng District, Taichung City in Taiwan. Sci. Innov. 2018, 6(3), 134-142. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20180603.14
AMA Style
Aiching Yen. Leadership, Collective Action in Developing Natural Farming: A Case Study at Wufeng District, Taichung City in Taiwan. Sci Innov. 2018;6(3):134-142. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20180603.14
@article{10.11648/j.si.20180603.14, author = {Aiching Yen}, title = {Leadership, Collective Action in Developing Natural Farming: A Case Study at Wufeng District, Taichung City in Taiwan}, journal = {Science Innovation}, volume = {6}, number = {3}, pages = {134-142}, doi = {10.11648/j.si.20180603.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20180603.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20180603.14}, abstract = {There is different character in each rural region which has its own set of opportunities and constraints. Due to the constraints, local leaders should mobilize actors together to build an understanding of how appropriately to find and use the resources. Drawing upon the local leadership and collective action literatures and based on evidence, this paper tries to explore the leadership of places through an examination of the experience of a Wufeng District Famers’ Association in Taichung City, Taiwan, whose purposes are safeguarding farmers’ rights and interests, enhancing farmers’ knowledge and skills, boosting the modernization of agriculture, increasing crop yields, improving farmers’ livelihood and developing rural economy. Whether these purposes can be achieved, the leadership of the director-general is the key to the outcome. In view of the importance of the healthy food supply, the director-general of the Wufeng Famers’ Association mobilizes the farmers to transfer from conventional farming to natural farming. In order to understand the role of leadership in collective action of promoting natural farming, this study takes qualitative research method and proposes three important driving forces that have contributed to the transformation of natural farming: the farmers’ association shapes the vision and plans the incentive mechanism, the agricultural experimentation station provides the cultivation techniques, and the successful mobilization of leaders of the production and marketing group. Some of research findings are:1. the role of leaders serves as essential ‘managers’ and ‘intermediaries’ to initiate and sustain collective action, and 2. the leaders seek for opportunities for resolving the problems facing sustainable development and tackling the challenges of collaborative and uncertain issues, 3. through the promoting of the leaders, the farmland area of natural farming is expanding rather quickly and turn the products of natural farming into high quality wine. The collective action seems successful; nevertheless, the leaders are still needed to cope with challenges from external environment. This paper hopes to share the experiences in Taiwan rural organization, deepen the theoretical dialogue, and extend the network for further social practices.}, year = {2018} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Leadership, Collective Action in Developing Natural Farming: A Case Study at Wufeng District, Taichung City in Taiwan AU - Aiching Yen Y1 - 2018/06/22 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20180603.14 DO - 10.11648/j.si.20180603.14 T2 - Science Innovation JF - Science Innovation JO - Science Innovation SP - 134 EP - 142 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-787X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20180603.14 AB - There is different character in each rural region which has its own set of opportunities and constraints. Due to the constraints, local leaders should mobilize actors together to build an understanding of how appropriately to find and use the resources. Drawing upon the local leadership and collective action literatures and based on evidence, this paper tries to explore the leadership of places through an examination of the experience of a Wufeng District Famers’ Association in Taichung City, Taiwan, whose purposes are safeguarding farmers’ rights and interests, enhancing farmers’ knowledge and skills, boosting the modernization of agriculture, increasing crop yields, improving farmers’ livelihood and developing rural economy. Whether these purposes can be achieved, the leadership of the director-general is the key to the outcome. In view of the importance of the healthy food supply, the director-general of the Wufeng Famers’ Association mobilizes the farmers to transfer from conventional farming to natural farming. In order to understand the role of leadership in collective action of promoting natural farming, this study takes qualitative research method and proposes three important driving forces that have contributed to the transformation of natural farming: the farmers’ association shapes the vision and plans the incentive mechanism, the agricultural experimentation station provides the cultivation techniques, and the successful mobilization of leaders of the production and marketing group. Some of research findings are:1. the role of leaders serves as essential ‘managers’ and ‘intermediaries’ to initiate and sustain collective action, and 2. the leaders seek for opportunities for resolving the problems facing sustainable development and tackling the challenges of collaborative and uncertain issues, 3. through the promoting of the leaders, the farmland area of natural farming is expanding rather quickly and turn the products of natural farming into high quality wine. The collective action seems successful; nevertheless, the leaders are still needed to cope with challenges from external environment. This paper hopes to share the experiences in Taiwan rural organization, deepen the theoretical dialogue, and extend the network for further social practices. VL - 6 IS - 3 ER -