Dunker [15] asserts that “linguistic reflexivity is a feature of the communication process, and it essentially depends on situated participants and time. It is a defining characteristic of the human language but despite its obvious importance, it is not very well understood theoretically, and it is strangely under-researched empirically”. Reflexivity exists in English, French, and Kinshasa Lingala. In all these languages, reflexivity is expressed by reflexive pronouns, reciprocal pronouns, reflexive verbs, and ergative verbs. The position and use of these pronouns and verbs differ from one language to another. Therefore, this article attempts to examine reflexivity in each of these languages in order to point out similarities and differences. The focus is on the use of reflexive pronouns, reciprocal pronouns, reflexive verbs, and ergative verbs in English, French, and Kinshasa Lingala. This article is based on observation, interview, and contrastive analysis which allows to sort out similarities and differences between languages. Observation was used during people’s talk on buses, at markets, on radios, and in avenues. An interview was prepared for some people in the Kinshasa community especially teachers. The results show that English, French, and Kinshasa Lingala use pronouns to express reflexivity. Reflexivity is expressed through the use of reflexive pronouns which have different positions in these three languages. In English, they occur in the object position. In French, they occur after a personal pronoun subject and before the verb. In Kinshasa Lingala, they occur in the verbal prefix position. As far as reciprocal pronouns are concerned, in English a reciprocal pronoun is used without reflexive pronoun whereas in French, reciprocal pronoun is optional and it is used with reflexive pronoun. In Kinshasa Lingala, the reciprocal pronoun is suffixed to the verb. It is a bound morpheme. Reflexivity is expressed by ergative verbs in English, French, and Kinshasa Lingala. In English, no reflexive pronoun is used with ergative verbs. In French, ergative verb is used with a reflexive pronoun “se”. In Kinshasa Lingala, the ergativity is expressed by the bound morpheme –ma or –mi. In conclusion, the similarities are at the level of the use of reflexive pronouns, reciprocal pronouns, and ergative verbs. Whereas the differences appear in the position occupied by the reflexive components. In English, reflexive pronouns and reciprocal pronouns occur in the object position. In French, they occur between the subject and the verb. In Kinshasa Lingala, the reflexive pronoun occurs in the verbal prefix position. Reciprocal pronoun occurs in the suffix position. Ergativity is expressed by –ma/-mi in the suffix position.
| Published in | Communication and Linguistics Studies (Volume 5, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.cls.20190501.11 |
| Page(s) | 1-7 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Reflexivity, Reflexive Pronouns, Reciprocal Pronouns, Reflexive Verbs, and Ergative Verbs
| [1] | Gardelle, L.(2012). “‘Anaphora’, ‘Anaphor’, and ‘Antecedent’ in Nominal Anaphora: definitions and theorectical implications” in Cercles pp. 25-40. Lyon: Ecole Normale Supérieur de Lyon. |
| [2] | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/antecedent_(grammar) |
| [3] | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ergative_verb |
| [4] | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/reflexivity(grammar) |
| [5] | https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/reflexive |
| [6] | https://français.lingolia.com/fr/grammaire/lespronoms-reflechis |
| [7] | https://www.gingersoftware.com/content/grammar_rules/reciprocalpronouns |
| [8] | https://www.grammarly.com/blog/reflexivepronouns |
| [9] | O’Grady, W. (2013). Reflexive pronouns in Second Language Acquisition in the Japanese Second Language Acquisition. Monoa: University of Hawai’I at Monoa. |
| [10] | Reinhart, T. An E. Reuland. (2002). Reflexivity. Zie Voor Verantwoording: Bron. |
| [11] | Storoshenko, D. R. et al. (2008). “Reflexivity in English: STAG Annalysis” in Proceeding on the ninth International worshop on Tree adjoin Grammar and Related formalism. Tübigen: Germany. |
| [12] | Richards, Jack C. & Richard Schmidt (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching & Applied Linguistics. Fourth Edition. Longman: Great Britain. |
| [13] | Ducarpe, D. (2018). 32 Reflexive pronoun Examples in Professional writing. Online. |
| [14] | Gluckman, J. (2018). Reflexivity and Reciprocity in Competition in Logoori. Kansas: University of Kansas. |
| [15] | Dunker, D. (2018). The Reflexivity of Language and Linguistic Inquiry. Integrational Linguistics in Practice. First Edition. London: Routledge. |
| [16] | Ejomafuvwe, C. And A. Okenrentie. (2018). “The Reflexive verb in the Grammar of Ufhobo Language” in International Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics. Vol. 4 (2), pp 187-194, August 2018. Delta State: Delta State University. |
APA Style
Larice Toko Lumanda. (2019). Reflexivity in English, French and Kinshasa Lingala: Similarities and Differences. Communication and Linguistics Studies, 5(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20190501.11
ACS Style
Larice Toko Lumanda. Reflexivity in English, French and Kinshasa Lingala: Similarities and Differences. Commun. Linguist. Stud. 2019, 5(1), 1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.cls.20190501.11
AMA Style
Larice Toko Lumanda. Reflexivity in English, French and Kinshasa Lingala: Similarities and Differences. Commun Linguist Stud. 2019;5(1):1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.cls.20190501.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.cls.20190501.11,
author = {Larice Toko Lumanda},
title = {Reflexivity in English, French and Kinshasa Lingala: Similarities and Differences},
journal = {Communication and Linguistics Studies},
volume = {5},
number = {1},
pages = {1-7},
doi = {10.11648/j.cls.20190501.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20190501.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cls.20190501.11},
abstract = {Dunker [15] asserts that “linguistic reflexivity is a feature of the communication process, and it essentially depends on situated participants and time. It is a defining characteristic of the human language but despite its obvious importance, it is not very well understood theoretically, and it is strangely under-researched empirically”. Reflexivity exists in English, French, and Kinshasa Lingala. In all these languages, reflexivity is expressed by reflexive pronouns, reciprocal pronouns, reflexive verbs, and ergative verbs. The position and use of these pronouns and verbs differ from one language to another. Therefore, this article attempts to examine reflexivity in each of these languages in order to point out similarities and differences. The focus is on the use of reflexive pronouns, reciprocal pronouns, reflexive verbs, and ergative verbs in English, French, and Kinshasa Lingala. This article is based on observation, interview, and contrastive analysis which allows to sort out similarities and differences between languages. Observation was used during people’s talk on buses, at markets, on radios, and in avenues. An interview was prepared for some people in the Kinshasa community especially teachers. The results show that English, French, and Kinshasa Lingala use pronouns to express reflexivity. Reflexivity is expressed through the use of reflexive pronouns which have different positions in these three languages. In English, they occur in the object position. In French, they occur after a personal pronoun subject and before the verb. In Kinshasa Lingala, they occur in the verbal prefix position. As far as reciprocal pronouns are concerned, in English a reciprocal pronoun is used without reflexive pronoun whereas in French, reciprocal pronoun is optional and it is used with reflexive pronoun. In Kinshasa Lingala, the reciprocal pronoun is suffixed to the verb. It is a bound morpheme. Reflexivity is expressed by ergative verbs in English, French, and Kinshasa Lingala. In English, no reflexive pronoun is used with ergative verbs. In French, ergative verb is used with a reflexive pronoun “se”. In Kinshasa Lingala, the ergativity is expressed by the bound morpheme –ma or –mi. In conclusion, the similarities are at the level of the use of reflexive pronouns, reciprocal pronouns, and ergative verbs. Whereas the differences appear in the position occupied by the reflexive components. In English, reflexive pronouns and reciprocal pronouns occur in the object position. In French, they occur between the subject and the verb. In Kinshasa Lingala, the reflexive pronoun occurs in the verbal prefix position. Reciprocal pronoun occurs in the suffix position. Ergativity is expressed by –ma/-mi in the suffix position.},
year = {2019}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Reflexivity in English, French and Kinshasa Lingala: Similarities and Differences AU - Larice Toko Lumanda Y1 - 2019/05/15 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20190501.11 DO - 10.11648/j.cls.20190501.11 T2 - Communication and Linguistics Studies JF - Communication and Linguistics Studies JO - Communication and Linguistics Studies SP - 1 EP - 7 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2380-2529 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20190501.11 AB - Dunker [15] asserts that “linguistic reflexivity is a feature of the communication process, and it essentially depends on situated participants and time. It is a defining characteristic of the human language but despite its obvious importance, it is not very well understood theoretically, and it is strangely under-researched empirically”. Reflexivity exists in English, French, and Kinshasa Lingala. In all these languages, reflexivity is expressed by reflexive pronouns, reciprocal pronouns, reflexive verbs, and ergative verbs. The position and use of these pronouns and verbs differ from one language to another. Therefore, this article attempts to examine reflexivity in each of these languages in order to point out similarities and differences. The focus is on the use of reflexive pronouns, reciprocal pronouns, reflexive verbs, and ergative verbs in English, French, and Kinshasa Lingala. This article is based on observation, interview, and contrastive analysis which allows to sort out similarities and differences between languages. Observation was used during people’s talk on buses, at markets, on radios, and in avenues. An interview was prepared for some people in the Kinshasa community especially teachers. The results show that English, French, and Kinshasa Lingala use pronouns to express reflexivity. Reflexivity is expressed through the use of reflexive pronouns which have different positions in these three languages. In English, they occur in the object position. In French, they occur after a personal pronoun subject and before the verb. In Kinshasa Lingala, they occur in the verbal prefix position. As far as reciprocal pronouns are concerned, in English a reciprocal pronoun is used without reflexive pronoun whereas in French, reciprocal pronoun is optional and it is used with reflexive pronoun. In Kinshasa Lingala, the reciprocal pronoun is suffixed to the verb. It is a bound morpheme. Reflexivity is expressed by ergative verbs in English, French, and Kinshasa Lingala. In English, no reflexive pronoun is used with ergative verbs. In French, ergative verb is used with a reflexive pronoun “se”. In Kinshasa Lingala, the ergativity is expressed by the bound morpheme –ma or –mi. In conclusion, the similarities are at the level of the use of reflexive pronouns, reciprocal pronouns, and ergative verbs. Whereas the differences appear in the position occupied by the reflexive components. In English, reflexive pronouns and reciprocal pronouns occur in the object position. In French, they occur between the subject and the verb. In Kinshasa Lingala, the reflexive pronoun occurs in the verbal prefix position. Reciprocal pronoun occurs in the suffix position. Ergativity is expressed by –ma/-mi in the suffix position. VL - 5 IS - 1 ER -
Email: