The Study of Biofield Energy Treatment Based Herbomineral Formulation in Skin Health and Function

Johanne Dodon; Mahendra Kumar Trivedi; Alice Branton; Dahryn Trivedi; Gopal Nayak; Mayank Gangwar; Snehasis Jana

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12

| Peer-Reviewed

The Study of Biofield Energy Treatment Based Herbomineral Formulation in Skin Health and Function

Johanne Dodon, Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Alice Branton, Dahryn Trivedi, Gopal Nayak, Mayank Gangwar, Snehasis Jana

Published in American Journal of BioScience (Volume 5, Issue 3)

Received: 30 March 2017 Accepted: 19 April 2017 Published: 9 May 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of the The Trivedi Effect^®- Consciousness Energy Healing Treatment based new proprietary herbomineral formulation and cell medium (DMEM) on various skin health parameters using HFF-1, HaCaT, and B16-F10 cell lines. It contained minerals (zinc chloride, sodium selenate, and sodium molybdate), L-ascorbic acid, along with the mixture of Centella asiatica extract and tetrahydrocurcumin (THC). The test formulation and DMEM were divided into two parts each, one part of each was coded as untreated (UT), while the second part of each was treated with the Biofield Treatment by Johanne Dodon and denoted as the Biofield Energy Treated (BT) test items. MTT assay result showed that the test formulation was safe and nontoxic up to 80 µg/mL concentration. The fibroblast cell proliferation assay using BrdU method showed a significant increased cell proliferation at 2.13, 8.75, and 17.53 µg/mL by 3.90%, 14.68% and 29.54%, respectively in the BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation group compared to the untreated group. The collagen data showed an increased synthesis by 7.42% and 3.84% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 0.625 µg/mL with respect to the untreated group. Similarly, the elastin synthesis was increased by 19.8% and 25.8% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 5 µg/mL with respect to the untreated group. However, the Biofield Energy Treated test formulation showed an increased level of hyaluronic acid by 1.7% in UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation group compared to the untreated group. Melanin synthesis inhibition was observed by 15.21% and 11.43% in UT-DMEM + BT-Test Formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test Formulation groups, respectively at 0.125 µg/mL compared with the untreated group in B16-F10 melanoma cell line. Anti-wrinkling effects showed an improved cell viability by 7.65% at 1.25 µg/mL in the BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation experimental group compared with the untreated test group. In addition, the Biofield Energy Treated Test formulation/DMEM showed a significant wound healing activity and high cellular migration of fibroblast and keratinocytes in HFF-1 and HaCaT cells, respectively. Overall, the data suggested that Biofield Treated formulation/DMEM could be helpful for skin healing, improvement the skin health, elasticity, and tightness, as well as, improving skin health issues such as wrinkling, pigmentation disorders, redness, swelling, skin cancer, aging, rashes, and skin sagging.

Published in	American Journal of BioScience (Volume 5, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12
Page(s)	42-53
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Consciousness Energy Healing Treatment, Extracellular Matrix, HaCaT, HFF-1, Hyaluronic Acid, Skin Protection, Scratch Assay, Tetrahydrocurcumin

References

[1]	Helmstädter A, Staiger C (2014) Traditional use of medicinal agents: a valid source of evidence. Drug Discov Today 19: 4-7.
[2]	Goyal RK (2005) Investigation of Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms for Anti-diabetic Drugs with Special Reference to Unani and Ayurvedic Herbal Medicines. In: Traditional System of Medicine, Abdin, M. Z. and Y. P. Abrol (Eds.). Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi.
[3]	WHO (1993) Research Guideline for Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Herbal Medicines. World Health Organization, Manila, Philippines.
[4]	Gao XH, Zhang L, Wei H, Chen HD (2008) Efficacy and safety of innovative cosmeceuticals. Clin Dermatol 26: 367-74.
[5]	Chanchal D, Swarnlata S (2008) Novel approaches in herbal cosmetics. J Cosmet Dermatol 7: 89-95.
[6]	Park K (2015) Role of Micronutrients in Skin Health and Function. Biomol Ther (Seoul) 23: 207-217.
[7]	Brinkhaus B, Lindner M, Schuppan D, Hahn EG (2000) Chemical, pharmacological and clinical profile of the East Asian medical plant Centella asiatica. Phytomedicine 75: 427-448.
[8]	Lai CS, Wu JC, Yu SF, Badmaev V, Nagabhushanam K, Ho CT, Pan MH (2011) Tetrahydrocurcumin is more effective than curcumin in preventing azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis. Mol Nutr Food Res 55: 1819-1828.
[9]	Aggarwal BB, Deb L, Prasad S (2015) Curcumin differs from tetrahydrocurcumin for molecular targets, signaling pathways and cellular responses. Molecules 20: 185-205.
[10]	Naito M, Wu X, Normura H, Kodama M, Kato Y, Osaswa T (2002) The protective effect of tetrahydrocurcumin on oxidative stress in cholesterol-fed rabbits. J Atheroscler Thromb 9: 243-250.
[11]	Shenefelt PD (2014) Energy medicine in dermatology. In: Norman RA, Shenefelt PD, Rupani RN, editors. Integrative Dermatology. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA.
[12]	Cooper EL (2007) The immune system and complementary and alternative medicine. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM 4: 5-8.
[13]	Clarke TC, Black LI, Stussman BJ, Barnes PM, Nahin RL (2015) Trends in the use of complementary health approaches among adults: Unites States, 2002-2012. National health statistics reports; no 79. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
[14]	Trivedi MK, Patil S (2008) Impact of an external energy on Staphylococcus epidermis [ATCC-13518] in relation to antimicrobials susceptibility and biochemical reactions-an experimental study. J Accord Integr Med 4: 230-235.
[15]	Trivedi MK, Patil S (2008) Impact of an external energy on Yersinia enterocolitica [ATCC-23715] in relation to antimicrobials susceptibility and biochemical reactions: an experimental study. Internet J Alternat Med 6: 13.
[16]	Trivedi MK, Bhardwaj Y, Patil S, Shettigar H, Bulbule A (2009) Impact of an external energy on Enterococcus faecalis [ATCC-51299] in relation to antimicrobials susceptibility and biochemical reactions-an experimental study. J Accord Integr Med 5: 119-130.
[17]	Trivedi MK, Patil S, Shettigar H, Gangwar M, Jana S (2015) In vitro evaluation of biofield treatment on cancer biomarkers involved in endometrial and prostate cancer cell lines. J Cancer Sci Ther 7: 253-257.
[18]	Trivedi MK, Patil S, Shettigar H, Mondal SC, Jana S (2015) An impact of biofield treatment: antimycobacterial susceptibility potential using BACTEC 460/MGIT-TB System. Mycobact Dis 5:189.
[19]	Trivedi MK, Branton A, Trivedi D, Nayak G, Mondal SC, Jana S (2015) In vitro evaluation of biofield treatment on viral load against human immunodeficiency-1 and cytomegalo viruses. American Journal of Health Research 3: 338-343.
[20]	Trivedi MK, Tallapragada RM, Branton A, Trivedi D, Nayak G, Mondal S, Jana S (2015) Impact of biofield energy treatment on soil fertility. Earth Sciences 4: 275-279.
[21]	Trivedi MK, Tallapragada RM, Branton A, Trivedi D, Nayak G, Mondal S, Jana S (2015) Evaluation of biochemical marker - Glutathione and DNA fingerprinting of biofield energy treated Oryza sativa. American Journal of BioScience. 3: 243-248.
[22]	Trivedi MK, Branton A, Trivedi D, Nayak G, Mondal SC, Jana S (2015) Morphological characterization, quality, yield and DNA fingerprinting of biofield energy treated alphonso mango (Mangifera indica L.). Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences 3: 245-250.
[23]	Trivedi MK, Branton A, Trivedi D, Nayak G, Mondal SC, Jana S (2015) Evaluation of plant growth, yield and yield attributes of biofield energy treated mustard (Brassica juncea) and chick pea (Cicer arietinum) seeds. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 4: 291-295.
[24]	Trivedi MK, Tallapragada RM, Branton A, Trivedi D, Nayak G, Bairwa K, Jana S (2015) Physical, thermal, and spectroscopic characterization of biofield energy treated potato micropropagation medium. American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 3: 106-113.
[25]	Trivedi MK, Patil S, Shettigar H, Bairwa K, Jana S (2015) Spectroscopic characterization of chloramphenicol and tetracycline: An impact of biofield. Pharm Anal Acta 6: 395.
[26]	Trivedi MK, Patil S, Shettigar H, Bairwa K, Jana S (2015) Spectroscopic characterization of biofield treated metronidazole and tinidazole. Med Chem 5: 340-344.
[27]	Trivedi MK, Nayak G, Patil S, Tallapragada RM, Latiyal O, Jana S (2015) Impact of biofield treatment on atomic and structural characteristics of barium titanate powder. Ind Eng Manage 4: 166.
[28]	Trivedi MK, Nayak G, Tallapragada RM, Patil S, Latiyal O, Jana S (2015) Effect of biofield treatment on structural and morphological properties of silicon carbide. J Powder Metall Min 4: 132.
[29]	Trivedi MK, Nayak G, Patil S, Tallapragada RM, Latiyal O (2015) Evaluation of biofield treatment on physical, atomic and structural characteristics of manganese (II, III) Oxide. J Material Sci Eng 4: 177.
[30]	Plumb JA (2004) Cell sensitivity assays: The MTT assay. Methods Mol Med 88:165-169.
[31]	Hahn MS, Kobler JB, Starcher BC, Zeitels SM, Langer R (2006) Quantitative and comparative studies of the vocal fold extracellular matrix. I: Elastic fibers and hyaluronic acid. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 115: 156-164.
[32]	Zhang L, Yoshida T, Kuroiwa Y (1992) Stimulation of melanin synthesis of B16-F10 mouse melanoma cells by bufalin. Life Sci 51: 17-24.
[33]	Wen KC, Shih IC, Hu JC, Liao ST, Su TW, Chiang HM (2011) Inhibitory effects of Terminalia catappa on UVB-Induced photodamage in fibroblast cell line. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2011: 904532.
[34]	Fronza M, Heinzmann B, Hamburger M, Laufer S, Merfort I (2009) Determination of the wound healing effect of Calendula extracts using the scratch assay with 3T3 fibroblasts. J Ethnopharmacol 126: 463-467.
[35]	Rozario T, DeSimone DW (2010) The extracellular matrix in development and morphogenesis: A dynamic view. Dev Biol 341: 126-40.
[36]	Frantz C, Stewart KM, Weaver VM (2010) The extracellular matrix at a glance. J Cell Sci 123: 4195-4200.
[37]	Weindl G, Schaller M, Schäfer-Korting M, Korting HC (2004) Hyaluronic acid in the treatment and prevention of skin diseases: Molecular biological, pharmaceutical and clinical aspects. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 17: 207-213.
[38]	Wattanakrai P, Suwanachote S, Kulkollakarn S, Rajatanavin N (2007) The study of human skin irritation of a novel herbal skin care product and ingredients by human single closed patch testing. J Med Assoc Thai 90: 1116-1122.
[39]	Bylka W, Znajdek-Awiżeń P, Studzińska-Sroka E, Brzezińska M (2013) Centella asiatica in cosmetology. Postepy Dermatol Alergol 30: 46-49.
[40]	Prasad S, Tyagi AK, Aggarwal BB (2014) Recent developments in delivery, bioavailability, absorption and metabolism of curcumin: The golden pigment from golden spice. Cancer Res Treat 46: 2-18.
[41]	Busca R, Ballotti R (2000) Cyclic AMP a key messenger in the regulation of skin pigmentation. Pigment Cell Res 13: 60-69.
[42]	Ho JN, Lee YH, Lee YD, Jun WJ, Kim HK, Hong BS, Shin DH, Cho HY (2005) Inhibitory effect of Aucubin isolated from Eucommia ulmoides against UVB induced matrix metalloproteinase-1 production in human skin fibroblasts. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 69: 2227-2231.
[43]	Liang CC, Park AY, Guan JL (2007) In vitro scratch assay: A convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro. Nat Protoc 2: 329-333.
[44]	Sumiyoshi M, Kimura Y (2009) Effects of a turmeric extract (Curcuma longa) on chronic ultraviolet B irradiation-induced skin damage in melanin-possessing hairless mice. Phytomedicine 16: 1137-1143.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Johanne Dodon, Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Alice Branton, Dahryn Trivedi, Gopal Nayak, et al. (2017). The Study of Biofield Energy Treatment Based Herbomineral Formulation in Skin Health and Function. American Journal of BioScience, 5(3), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Johanne Dodon; Mahendra Kumar Trivedi; Alice Branton; Dahryn Trivedi; Gopal Nayak, et al. The Study of Biofield Energy Treatment Based Herbomineral Formulation in Skin Health and Function. Am. J. BioScience 2017, 5(3), 42-53. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Johanne Dodon, Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Alice Branton, Dahryn Trivedi, Gopal Nayak, et al. The Study of Biofield Energy Treatment Based Herbomineral Formulation in Skin Health and Function. Am J BioScience. 2017;5(3):42-53. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12,
  author = {Johanne Dodon and Mahendra Kumar Trivedi and Alice Branton and Dahryn Trivedi and Gopal Nayak and Mayank Gangwar and Snehasis Jana},
  title = {The Study of Biofield Energy Treatment Based Herbomineral Formulation in Skin Health and Function},
  journal = {American Journal of BioScience},
  volume = {5},
  number = {3},
  pages = {42-53},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbio.20170503.12},
  abstract = {The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of the The Trivedi Effect®- Consciousness Energy Healing Treatment based new proprietary herbomineral formulation and cell medium (DMEM) on various skin health parameters using HFF-1, HaCaT, and B16-F10 cell lines. It contained minerals (zinc chloride, sodium selenate, and sodium molybdate), L-ascorbic acid, along with the mixture of Centella asiatica extract and tetrahydrocurcumin (THC). The test formulation and DMEM were divided into two parts each, one part of each was coded as untreated (UT), while the second part of each was treated with the Biofield Treatment by Johanne Dodon and denoted as the Biofield Energy Treated (BT) test items. MTT assay result showed that the test formulation was safe and nontoxic up to 80 µg/mL concentration. The fibroblast cell proliferation assay using BrdU method showed a significant increased cell proliferation at 2.13, 8.75, and 17.53 µg/mL by 3.90%, 14.68% and 29.54%, respectively in the BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation group compared to the untreated group. The collagen data showed an increased synthesis by 7.42% and 3.84% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 0.625 µg/mL with respect to the untreated group. Similarly, the elastin synthesis was increased by 19.8% and 25.8% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 5 µg/mL with respect to the untreated group. However, the Biofield Energy Treated test formulation showed an increased level of hyaluronic acid by 1.7% in UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation group compared to the untreated group. Melanin synthesis inhibition was observed by 15.21% and 11.43% in UT-DMEM + BT-Test Formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test Formulation groups, respectively at 0.125 µg/mL compared with the untreated group in B16-F10 melanoma cell line. Anti-wrinkling effects showed an improved cell viability by 7.65% at 1.25 µg/mL in the BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation experimental group compared with the untreated test group. In addition, the Biofield Energy Treated Test formulation/DMEM showed a significant wound healing activity and high cellular migration of fibroblast and keratinocytes in HFF-1 and HaCaT cells, respectively. Overall, the data suggested that Biofield Treated formulation/DMEM could be helpful for skin healing, improvement the skin health, elasticity, and tightness, as well as, improving skin health issues such as wrinkling, pigmentation disorders, redness, swelling, skin cancer, aging, rashes, and skin sagging.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Study of Biofield Energy Treatment Based Herbomineral Formulation in Skin Health and Function
AU  - Johanne Dodon
AU  - Mahendra Kumar Trivedi
AU  - Alice Branton
AU  - Dahryn Trivedi
AU  - Gopal Nayak
AU  - Mayank Gangwar
AU  - Snehasis Jana
Y1  - 2017/05/09
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12
T2  - American Journal of BioScience
JF  - American Journal of BioScience
JO  - American Journal of BioScience
SP  - 42
EP  - 53
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-0167
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12
AB  - The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of the The Trivedi Effect®- Consciousness Energy Healing Treatment based new proprietary herbomineral formulation and cell medium (DMEM) on various skin health parameters using HFF-1, HaCaT, and B16-F10 cell lines. It contained minerals (zinc chloride, sodium selenate, and sodium molybdate), L-ascorbic acid, along with the mixture of Centella asiatica extract and tetrahydrocurcumin (THC). The test formulation and DMEM were divided into two parts each, one part of each was coded as untreated (UT), while the second part of each was treated with the Biofield Treatment by Johanne Dodon and denoted as the Biofield Energy Treated (BT) test items. MTT assay result showed that the test formulation was safe and nontoxic up to 80 µg/mL concentration. The fibroblast cell proliferation assay using BrdU method showed a significant increased cell proliferation at 2.13, 8.75, and 17.53 µg/mL by 3.90%, 14.68% and 29.54%, respectively in the BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation group compared to the untreated group. The collagen data showed an increased synthesis by 7.42% and 3.84% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 0.625 µg/mL with respect to the untreated group. Similarly, the elastin synthesis was increased by 19.8% and 25.8% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 5 µg/mL with respect to the untreated group. However, the Biofield Energy Treated test formulation showed an increased level of hyaluronic acid by 1.7% in UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation group compared to the untreated group. Melanin synthesis inhibition was observed by 15.21% and 11.43% in UT-DMEM + BT-Test Formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test Formulation groups, respectively at 0.125 µg/mL compared with the untreated group in B16-F10 melanoma cell line. Anti-wrinkling effects showed an improved cell viability by 7.65% at 1.25 µg/mL in the BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation experimental group compared with the untreated test group. In addition, the Biofield Energy Treated Test formulation/DMEM showed a significant wound healing activity and high cellular migration of fibroblast and keratinocytes in HFF-1 and HaCaT cells, respectively. Overall, the data suggested that Biofield Treated formulation/DMEM could be helpful for skin healing, improvement the skin health, elasticity, and tightness, as well as, improving skin health issues such as wrinkling, pigmentation disorders, redness, swelling, skin cancer, aging, rashes, and skin sagging.
VL  - 5
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Johanne Dodon

Trivedi Global, Inc., Henderson, USA
Mahendra Kumar Trivedi

Trivedi Global, Inc., Henderson, USA
Alice Branton

Trivedi Global, Inc., Henderson, USA
Dahryn Trivedi

Trivedi Global, Inc., Henderson, USA
Gopal Nayak

Trivedi Global, Inc., Henderson, USA
Mayank Gangwar

Trivedi Science Research Laboratory Pvt. Ltd., Bhopal, India
Snehasis Jana

Trivedi Science Research Laboratory Pvt. Ltd., Bhopal, India

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Johanne Dodon, Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Alice Branton, Dahryn Trivedi, Gopal Nayak, et al. (2017). The Study of Biofield Energy Treatment Based Herbomineral Formulation in Skin Health and Function. American Journal of BioScience, 5(3), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Johanne Dodon; Mahendra Kumar Trivedi; Alice Branton; Dahryn Trivedi; Gopal Nayak, et al. The Study of Biofield Energy Treatment Based Herbomineral Formulation in Skin Health and Function. Am. J. BioScience 2017, 5(3), 42-53. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Johanne Dodon, Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Alice Branton, Dahryn Trivedi, Gopal Nayak, et al. The Study of Biofield Energy Treatment Based Herbomineral Formulation in Skin Health and Function. Am J BioScience. 2017;5(3):42-53. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12,
  author = {Johanne Dodon and Mahendra Kumar Trivedi and Alice Branton and Dahryn Trivedi and Gopal Nayak and Mayank Gangwar and Snehasis Jana},
  title = {The Study of Biofield Energy Treatment Based Herbomineral Formulation in Skin Health and Function},
  journal = {American Journal of BioScience},
  volume = {5},
  number = {3},
  pages = {42-53},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbio.20170503.12},
  abstract = {The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of the The Trivedi Effect®- Consciousness Energy Healing Treatment based new proprietary herbomineral formulation and cell medium (DMEM) on various skin health parameters using HFF-1, HaCaT, and B16-F10 cell lines. It contained minerals (zinc chloride, sodium selenate, and sodium molybdate), L-ascorbic acid, along with the mixture of Centella asiatica extract and tetrahydrocurcumin (THC). The test formulation and DMEM were divided into two parts each, one part of each was coded as untreated (UT), while the second part of each was treated with the Biofield Treatment by Johanne Dodon and denoted as the Biofield Energy Treated (BT) test items. MTT assay result showed that the test formulation was safe and nontoxic up to 80 µg/mL concentration. The fibroblast cell proliferation assay using BrdU method showed a significant increased cell proliferation at 2.13, 8.75, and 17.53 µg/mL by 3.90%, 14.68% and 29.54%, respectively in the BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation group compared to the untreated group. The collagen data showed an increased synthesis by 7.42% and 3.84% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 0.625 µg/mL with respect to the untreated group. Similarly, the elastin synthesis was increased by 19.8% and 25.8% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 5 µg/mL with respect to the untreated group. However, the Biofield Energy Treated test formulation showed an increased level of hyaluronic acid by 1.7% in UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation group compared to the untreated group. Melanin synthesis inhibition was observed by 15.21% and 11.43% in UT-DMEM + BT-Test Formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test Formulation groups, respectively at 0.125 µg/mL compared with the untreated group in B16-F10 melanoma cell line. Anti-wrinkling effects showed an improved cell viability by 7.65% at 1.25 µg/mL in the BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation experimental group compared with the untreated test group. In addition, the Biofield Energy Treated Test formulation/DMEM showed a significant wound healing activity and high cellular migration of fibroblast and keratinocytes in HFF-1 and HaCaT cells, respectively. Overall, the data suggested that Biofield Treated formulation/DMEM could be helpful for skin healing, improvement the skin health, elasticity, and tightness, as well as, improving skin health issues such as wrinkling, pigmentation disorders, redness, swelling, skin cancer, aging, rashes, and skin sagging.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Study of Biofield Energy Treatment Based Herbomineral Formulation in Skin Health and Function
AU  - Johanne Dodon
AU  - Mahendra Kumar Trivedi
AU  - Alice Branton
AU  - Dahryn Trivedi
AU  - Gopal Nayak
AU  - Mayank Gangwar
AU  - Snehasis Jana
Y1  - 2017/05/09
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12
T2  - American Journal of BioScience
JF  - American Journal of BioScience
JO  - American Journal of BioScience
SP  - 42
EP  - 53
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-0167
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20170503.12
AB  - The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of the The Trivedi Effect®- Consciousness Energy Healing Treatment based new proprietary herbomineral formulation and cell medium (DMEM) on various skin health parameters using HFF-1, HaCaT, and B16-F10 cell lines. It contained minerals (zinc chloride, sodium selenate, and sodium molybdate), L-ascorbic acid, along with the mixture of Centella asiatica extract and tetrahydrocurcumin (THC). The test formulation and DMEM were divided into two parts each, one part of each was coded as untreated (UT), while the second part of each was treated with the Biofield Treatment by Johanne Dodon and denoted as the Biofield Energy Treated (BT) test items. MTT assay result showed that the test formulation was safe and nontoxic up to 80 µg/mL concentration. The fibroblast cell proliferation assay using BrdU method showed a significant increased cell proliferation at 2.13, 8.75, and 17.53 µg/mL by 3.90%, 14.68% and 29.54%, respectively in the BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation group compared to the untreated group. The collagen data showed an increased synthesis by 7.42% and 3.84% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 0.625 µg/mL with respect to the untreated group. Similarly, the elastin synthesis was increased by 19.8% and 25.8% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 5 µg/mL with respect to the untreated group. However, the Biofield Energy Treated test formulation showed an increased level of hyaluronic acid by 1.7% in UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation group compared to the untreated group. Melanin synthesis inhibition was observed by 15.21% and 11.43% in UT-DMEM + BT-Test Formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test Formulation groups, respectively at 0.125 µg/mL compared with the untreated group in B16-F10 melanoma cell line. Anti-wrinkling effects showed an improved cell viability by 7.65% at 1.25 µg/mL in the BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation experimental group compared with the untreated test group. In addition, the Biofield Energy Treated Test formulation/DMEM showed a significant wound healing activity and high cellular migration of fibroblast and keratinocytes in HFF-1 and HaCaT cells, respectively. Overall, the data suggested that Biofield Treated formulation/DMEM could be helpful for skin healing, improvement the skin health, elasticity, and tightness, as well as, improving skin health issues such as wrinkling, pigmentation disorders, redness, swelling, skin cancer, aging, rashes, and skin sagging.
VL  - 5
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download