This paper focuses on exploring the relationship between inflation and economic growth in Saudi Arabia. The real growth of non-oil measure is used as a dependent variable, whereas wholesale price is implemented as a proxy for inflation. This study covers the period of 1985-2015. The short and long-run relationships are estimated using co-integration techniques. The results support the existence of positive effects of inflation over economic growth. The threshold level of inflation for non-oil GDP is around a 10 percent. In addition, the long-run causality is running from inflation to real growth of non-oil GDP. The impulse responses test points out that future responsiveness of growth due to impulse of inflation is negative and significant after a year and a half. Whereas, the inflation responsiveness due to a shock in growth is effective positively after three years and a half in the future.
Published in | Journal of World Economic Research (Volume 5, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jwer.20160505.13 |
Page(s) | 65-71 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Non-oil GDP, Saudi Arabia, Co-integration Analysis, Causality, Inflation
[1] | Algaeed, A. (1991). Oil Windfalls, the Dutch Disease, and the Saudi Arabian Experience: 1970-1991. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Missouri-Columbia. 1991 |
[2] | Barro, R. (1995). Inflation and Economic Growth. NBER Working Paper, 1995. |
[3] | Birma, A. (2011). Some Empirical Aspects Regarding the Relationship between Inflation and Economic Growth in Romania: The Speed Limit Effect. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. Vol. 3.2. Dec. 2011. Pp. 55-76. |
[4] | Cooley, F., Hansen, D. (1989). The Inflation Tax in a Real Business Cycle Model. American Economic Review. Vol 79, Pp.733-48. Economics. |
[5] | Eggoh, J., and Khan, M. (2014). On the Non-linear Relationship between Inflation and Economic Growth. Research Economics. Vol.68. No. 2. June 2014 |
[6] | Engle, R. F. and Granger, C. (1987). Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing. Econometrica, Vol. 55, No. 2, Pp. 251-276. |
[7] | Gillman, M., Harria, M., and Malyars, L. (2010). The Effect of Inflation and Growth. Evidence from a Panel of Transition Countries. Economics of Transition. Vol. 18(4). Pp. 697 – 714. |
[8] | Gokal, V. and Hanif, S. (2004). Relationship between Inflation and Economic Growth. Working Paper, 2004/4. Reserve Bank of Fiji. Dec. 2004. |
[9] | Hasanov, F. (2011). Relationship between Inflation and Economic Growth in Azerbijani Economy: Is There Any Threshold effect? MPRA. June, 2011. |
[10] | Hossain, M. (2015). The Relationship between Inflation and Economic Growth of Bangladesh: An Empirical Analysis From 1961-2013. International Journal of Economics, Finance, and Management Sciences. Vol. 13, Issue 5. Oct. 2015. |
[11] | Hussain, S. (2011) Inflation and Economic Growth: Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Economic and Finance, Vol. 3. No. 5. Pp. 262-276. |
[12] | Johansen, S. Juselius. K. (1990). Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Co-integration with the Application to the Demand for Money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 52. Pp. 169-210. |
[13] | Joudaki, H., et al. (2014). Causal Relationship between Inflation and Economic Growth in Iran During the Years 1978-2011. Kuwait Chapter of the Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review. Vol. 3.6. Feb. 2014. Pp. 190-201. |
[14] | Khan, M. and Senhadji, A. (2001). Threshold Effects in the Relationship between Inflation and Growth. IMF Stuff Papers Vol. 48, No.1. |
[15] | Khan, M. (2002). Inflation, Financial Deepening, and Economic Growth. IMF. Paper for Banco de Mexico Conference on Macro economic, Stability, Financial Markets and Economic Development. |
[16] | Mallik, G. and Chowdhury, A. (2001) Inflation and Economic Growth: Evidence from Four South Asian Countries, Asian Pacific Development Journal, Vol. 8. No. 1. Pp. 123-135. |
[17] | Maduradperuma, M. (2016). The Impact of Inflation on Economic Growth in Srilanka. Journal of World Economic Research. Vol. 5, No. 1. |
[18] | Mubarik, Y. (2005). Inflation and Growth: An Estimate of the Threshold Level of Inflation in Pakistan. State Bank of Pakistan Research Bulletin. Vol. 1, No. 1-2. Pp. 35-44. |
[19] | Munir, Q. and Kasim, M. (2009). Non Linearity between Inflation Rate and GDP Growth in Malaysia. Economics Bulletin. Vol. 29, Issue 3. |
[20] | Sarel, M., (1996). Non-linear Effects of Inflation on Economic Growth. IMF Staff Papers. Vol. 43. Pp. 199-215. |
[21] | Sargsyan, G. (2005). Inflation and Output in Armenia: The Threshold Effect Revisited. Preceding of the 3rd International AIPRG conference on Armenia. Jan. 15-16. World Bank. Washington, DC. |
[22] | Sidrauski, M. (1967). Inflation and economic growth. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 75. Pp. 796-810. |
[23] | Stockman, A. (1981). Anticipated Inflation and Capital Stock in A Cash-in-Advance Economy. Journal of Monetary Economics. Vol. 8. Pp. 387–93. |
[24] | Tobin, J. (1965). Money and Economic Growth. Econometrica. Vol. 33. Pp. 671-684. |
APA Style
Abdulaziz Hamad Algaeed. (2016). The Relationship Between Inflation and Economic Growth: A Further Evidence. Journal of World Economic Research, 5(5), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jwer.20160505.13
ACS Style
Abdulaziz Hamad Algaeed. The Relationship Between Inflation and Economic Growth: A Further Evidence. J. World Econ. Res. 2016, 5(5), 65-71. doi: 10.11648/j.jwer.20160505.13
@article{10.11648/j.jwer.20160505.13, author = {Abdulaziz Hamad Algaeed}, title = {The Relationship Between Inflation and Economic Growth: A Further Evidence}, journal = {Journal of World Economic Research}, volume = {5}, number = {5}, pages = {65-71}, doi = {10.11648/j.jwer.20160505.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jwer.20160505.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jwer.20160505.13}, abstract = {This paper focuses on exploring the relationship between inflation and economic growth in Saudi Arabia. The real growth of non-oil measure is used as a dependent variable, whereas wholesale price is implemented as a proxy for inflation. This study covers the period of 1985-2015. The short and long-run relationships are estimated using co-integration techniques. The results support the existence of positive effects of inflation over economic growth. The threshold level of inflation for non-oil GDP is around a 10 percent. In addition, the long-run causality is running from inflation to real growth of non-oil GDP. The impulse responses test points out that future responsiveness of growth due to impulse of inflation is negative and significant after a year and a half. Whereas, the inflation responsiveness due to a shock in growth is effective positively after three years and a half in the future.}, year = {2016} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Relationship Between Inflation and Economic Growth: A Further Evidence AU - Abdulaziz Hamad Algaeed Y1 - 2016/10/09 PY - 2016 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jwer.20160505.13 DO - 10.11648/j.jwer.20160505.13 T2 - Journal of World Economic Research JF - Journal of World Economic Research JO - Journal of World Economic Research SP - 65 EP - 71 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7748 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jwer.20160505.13 AB - This paper focuses on exploring the relationship between inflation and economic growth in Saudi Arabia. The real growth of non-oil measure is used as a dependent variable, whereas wholesale price is implemented as a proxy for inflation. This study covers the period of 1985-2015. The short and long-run relationships are estimated using co-integration techniques. The results support the existence of positive effects of inflation over economic growth. The threshold level of inflation for non-oil GDP is around a 10 percent. In addition, the long-run causality is running from inflation to real growth of non-oil GDP. The impulse responses test points out that future responsiveness of growth due to impulse of inflation is negative and significant after a year and a half. Whereas, the inflation responsiveness due to a shock in growth is effective positively after three years and a half in the future. VL - 5 IS - 5 ER -