Introduction: Laparoscopic surgery is a major component of the field of minimally invasive and minimally access surgery and is performed through an opening in the abdominal wall with a rigid endoscope allowing visual inspection of the peritoneal cavity and its organs. Laparoscopy has been used in veterinary medicine with any degree of frequency only for the last 25 to 30 years and is primarily centered on reproductive function studies in food animals and equine, nonhuman primate, and various zoo and exotic species. Although the indications for laparoscopy may be far more extensive in human medicine, it still has many potential applications for use in veterinary medicine. It is a procedure that can be performed with a high degree of safety. Indications: There are three indications of using the laparoscope in animals; the 1st is diagnostic, the 2nd is therapeutic and the 3rd is creating the excellent training model for minimally invasive surgery of human diseases. Contraindications: There are several absolute and relative contraindications for performing laparoscopy in human and animals. The absolute contraindications include acute or unstable cardiopulmonary conditions, presence of an uncorrectable or severe coagulopathy, cases in which extensive intraabdominal adhesions could have developed bowel obstruction, abdominal herniation and septic peritonitis. A relative contraindication must be balanced against the need for diagnosis and risks of alternative methods of diagnosis. Complications: The complication rate associated with laparoscopy depends on operator experience, accurate patient assessment and recognition by the clinician of appropriate indications and any possible contraindications, and quality of the laparoscopic equipment used. Conclusion: Owing to the minimal invasiveness and minimal access and short time of hospitalization and recovery of animals, laparoscopic techniques become more and more interesting not only for veterinary surgeons but also for owners of the animals.
Published in |
Journal of Surgery (Volume 5, Issue 3-1)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Minimally Invasive and Minimally Access Surgery |
DOI | 10.11648/j.js.s.2017050301.18 |
Page(s) | 39-42 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Surgery, Minimal Access, Laparoscopy, Animals
[1] | Ragle CA and Fransson BA. (2003) Fundamental Laparoscopic Skill. In Claude A. Ragle (ed): Advances in Equine Laparoscopy, First Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 13-20. |
[2] | Won WW, Sharma A, Wu W. Retrospective comparison of abdominal ultrasonography and radiography in the investigation of feline abdominal disease. Can Vet J. 2015 Oct; 56 (10): 1065–1068. |
[3] | Fields EL, Robertson ID, Osborne JA, Brown JC., Jr Comparison of abdominal computed tomography and abdominal ultrasound in sedated dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2012; 53: 513–517. |
[4] | Tams TR. (2003). Endoscopy and laparoscopy in veterinary gastroenterology. In: Tams TR (ed). Handbook Of Small Animal Gastroenterology. St. Louis, Missouri. 97-117. |
[5] | Fernandez-Pineda I, Millan A, Morcillo J, De Agustin JC. Laparoscopic surgery in a rat model. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010 Jul-Aug; 20 (6): 575-6. |
[6] | Matyjasik H, Adamiak Z, Pesta W, Zhalniarovich Y. Laparoscopic procedures in dogs and cats. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 2011, 14(2): 305-316. |
[7] | Naveen Kumar, Diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy veterinary patients. J Veterinar Sci Technolo 2014, 5 (3): 175 |
[8] | Freeman LJ. Gastrointestinal Laparoscopy in Small Animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract, 2009; 39 (5), 903-924. |
[9] | Mayhew PD, Mehler SJ, Radhakrishnan A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for management of uncomplicated gall bladder mucocele in six dogs. Vet Surg, 2008; 37 (7): 625–630. |
[10] | van Velthoven RF, Hoffmann P. Methods for laparoscopic training using animal models. Curr Urol Rep. 2006; 7 (2): 114-9. |
[11] | Simforoosh N, Khazaeli M, Nouralizadeh A, Soltani MH, Samzadeh M, Saffarian O, Rahmani J. Laparoscopic animal surgery for training without sacrificing animals; introducing the rabbit as a model for infantile laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 Dec; 21 (10): 929-33. |
[12] | Stolzenburg JU, Truss MC, Rabenalt R, Do M, Schwalenberg T, Katsakiori PF, McNeill A, Liatsikos E. Training in Laparoscopy. eau - ebu updat e-series 5 (2007) 53–62 |
[13] | Tunc L, Guven S, Gurbuz C, et al. Evaluation of Applied Laparoscopic Urology Course Using Validated Checklist. JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2013; 17 (2): 300-305. |
[14] | Keyser EJ, Derossis AM, Antoniuk M, Sigman HH, Fried GM. A simplified simulator for the training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 2000;14: 149–53. |
[15] | Scott DJ, Young WN, Tesfay ST, Frawley WH, Rege RV, Jones DB. Laparoscopic skills training. Am J Surg 2001; 182:137–42. |
[16] | Hyltander A, Liljegren E, Rhodin PH, Lonroth H. The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 1324–8. |
[17] | Ying Hao Sun, Zhenjie Wu, and Bo Yang. The Laparoscopic Animal Lab Training Module. (2012) in Sun YH, Wu Z, and Yang B (Eds) The Training Courses of Urological Laparoscopy. Springer-Verlag London. 45-59 |
[18] | Yıldırım G, Attar R, Fıçıcıoğlu C, Karateke A, Çetinkaya N, Kumbak B, Yeşildağlar N. A pilot study: feasibility of a sheep model for training in laparoscopic surgery without using any volatile anesthetics. J Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc 2009; 10: 57-8. |
[19] | Katz R, Nadu A, Olsson LE, et al. A simplified 5-step model for training laparoscopic urethrovesical anastomosis. J Urol 2003; 169: 2041–4. |
[20] | Yen CF, Lee CL, Murk W, Han CM, Liao SK. Reducing peritoneal vascular endothelial growth factor concentration and inhibiting cancer scattering in a mouse model of laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol.2008 Apr; 198 (4): 423. e1-7. |
[21] | Kaouk J, Gill I, Meraney A, et al.: Retroperitoneal minilaparoscopic nephrectomy in the rat model. Urology 2000, 56: 1058–1062. |
[22] | Beyer-Berjot L, Palter V, Grantcharov T, Aggarwal R. Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery (Atlas): A Systematic Review. Surgery. 2014; 156 (3): 676-688. |
[23] | Bollens R, Sandhu S, Roumeguere T, Quackels T, Schulman C. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the learning curve. Curr Opin Urol 2005; 15: 79–82. |
[24] | Close CE, Anderson PD, Edwards GA, Mitchell ME, Dewan PA. Autoaugmentation Gastrocystoplasty: Further Studies Of The Sheep Model. BJU International 2004; 4: 658-62. |
[25] | Kimber CP, Dunkley MP, Haddock G, Robertson L, Carey FA, Cuschieri A. Patch incorporation in diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35: 120-3. |
[26] | Fransson BA, Ragle CA. Assessment of laparoscopic skills before and after simulation training with a canine abdominal model. J Am Vet Med Ass 2010, 236 (10): 1079-1084. |
APA Style
Aly Saber, Emad K. Bayumi, Leonie Sophia Van Den Hoek. (2017). Minimal Access and Minimally invasive Surgery in Veterinary Practice. Journal of Surgery, 5(3-1), 39-42. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.s.2017050301.18
ACS Style
Aly Saber; Emad K. Bayumi; Leonie Sophia Van Den Hoek. Minimal Access and Minimally invasive Surgery in Veterinary Practice. J. Surg. 2017, 5(3-1), 39-42. doi: 10.11648/j.js.s.2017050301.18
@article{10.11648/j.js.s.2017050301.18, author = {Aly Saber and Emad K. Bayumi and Leonie Sophia Van Den Hoek}, title = {Minimal Access and Minimally invasive Surgery in Veterinary Practice}, journal = {Journal of Surgery}, volume = {5}, number = {3-1}, pages = {39-42}, doi = {10.11648/j.js.s.2017050301.18}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.s.2017050301.18}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.js.s.2017050301.18}, abstract = {Introduction: Laparoscopic surgery is a major component of the field of minimally invasive and minimally access surgery and is performed through an opening in the abdominal wall with a rigid endoscope allowing visual inspection of the peritoneal cavity and its organs. Laparoscopy has been used in veterinary medicine with any degree of frequency only for the last 25 to 30 years and is primarily centered on reproductive function studies in food animals and equine, nonhuman primate, and various zoo and exotic species. Although the indications for laparoscopy may be far more extensive in human medicine, it still has many potential applications for use in veterinary medicine. It is a procedure that can be performed with a high degree of safety. Indications: There are three indications of using the laparoscope in animals; the 1st is diagnostic, the 2nd is therapeutic and the 3rd is creating the excellent training model for minimally invasive surgery of human diseases. Contraindications: There are several absolute and relative contraindications for performing laparoscopy in human and animals. The absolute contraindications include acute or unstable cardiopulmonary conditions, presence of an uncorrectable or severe coagulopathy, cases in which extensive intraabdominal adhesions could have developed bowel obstruction, abdominal herniation and septic peritonitis. A relative contraindication must be balanced against the need for diagnosis and risks of alternative methods of diagnosis. Complications: The complication rate associated with laparoscopy depends on operator experience, accurate patient assessment and recognition by the clinician of appropriate indications and any possible contraindications, and quality of the laparoscopic equipment used. Conclusion: Owing to the minimal invasiveness and minimal access and short time of hospitalization and recovery of animals, laparoscopic techniques become more and more interesting not only for veterinary surgeons but also for owners of the animals.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Minimal Access and Minimally invasive Surgery in Veterinary Practice AU - Aly Saber AU - Emad K. Bayumi AU - Leonie Sophia Van Den Hoek Y1 - 2017/02/28 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.s.2017050301.18 DO - 10.11648/j.js.s.2017050301.18 T2 - Journal of Surgery JF - Journal of Surgery JO - Journal of Surgery SP - 39 EP - 42 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0930 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.s.2017050301.18 AB - Introduction: Laparoscopic surgery is a major component of the field of minimally invasive and minimally access surgery and is performed through an opening in the abdominal wall with a rigid endoscope allowing visual inspection of the peritoneal cavity and its organs. Laparoscopy has been used in veterinary medicine with any degree of frequency only for the last 25 to 30 years and is primarily centered on reproductive function studies in food animals and equine, nonhuman primate, and various zoo and exotic species. Although the indications for laparoscopy may be far more extensive in human medicine, it still has many potential applications for use in veterinary medicine. It is a procedure that can be performed with a high degree of safety. Indications: There are three indications of using the laparoscope in animals; the 1st is diagnostic, the 2nd is therapeutic and the 3rd is creating the excellent training model for minimally invasive surgery of human diseases. Contraindications: There are several absolute and relative contraindications for performing laparoscopy in human and animals. The absolute contraindications include acute or unstable cardiopulmonary conditions, presence of an uncorrectable or severe coagulopathy, cases in which extensive intraabdominal adhesions could have developed bowel obstruction, abdominal herniation and septic peritonitis. A relative contraindication must be balanced against the need for diagnosis and risks of alternative methods of diagnosis. Complications: The complication rate associated with laparoscopy depends on operator experience, accurate patient assessment and recognition by the clinician of appropriate indications and any possible contraindications, and quality of the laparoscopic equipment used. Conclusion: Owing to the minimal invasiveness and minimal access and short time of hospitalization and recovery of animals, laparoscopic techniques become more and more interesting not only for veterinary surgeons but also for owners of the animals. VL - 5 IS - 3-1 ER -