We classify geometric blocks that serve as spin carriers into simple blocks and compound blocks by their topologic connectivity, define their fractal dimensions and describe the relevant transformations. By the hierarchical property of transformations and a block-spin scaling law we obtain a relation between the block spin and its carrier’s fractal dimension. By mapping we set up a block-spin Gaussian model and get a formula connecting the critical point and the minimal fractal dimension of the carrier, which guarantees the uniqueness of a fixed point corresponding to the critical point, changing the complicated calculation of critical point into the simple one of the minimal fractal dimension. The numerical results of critical points with high accuracy for five conventional lattice-Ising models prove our method very effective and may be suitable to all lattice-Ising models. The origin of fluctuations in structure at critical temperature is discussed. Our method not only explains the problems met in the renormalization-group theory, but also provides a useful tool for deep investigation of the critical behaviour.
| Published in | American Journal of Modern Physics (Volume 3, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajmp.20140304.16 |
| Page(s) | 184-194 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Ising, Renormalization, Fractal
| [1] | HA Kramers and GH Wannier, Phys. Rev. 60, 247, 1941. |
| [2] | L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 65, 117, 1944. |
| [3] | You-Gang Feng, EJTP 7, 12, 2005 |
| [4] | H. Arisue, T. Fujwara, and K. Tabata, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl) 129&130, 774, 2004. |
| [5] | Nan-zhi Zhou, Da-fang Zheng and You-yan Lin, Phys. Rev. A 42, 3259, 1990. |
| [6] | Gyan Bhanot, Michael Creutz, and Jan Lacki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1841, 1992. |
| [7] | Zhi-Dong Zhang, Phil. Mag. B 87, 5307, 2007. |
| [8] | F. Y. Wu, B. M. McCoy, M. E. Fisher, and L. Chayes, Phil. Mag. B 88, 3093, 2008. |
| [9] | J Als-Nielsen, J. and R. J. Birgeneau, American Journal of Physics 45, 554, 1977. |
| [10] | Fisher M. E., and Essam J. W., J. Math. Phys. 2, 609, 1961. |
| [11] | B. Widom, J. Chem. Phys. 43, 3898, 1965. |
| [12] | Kadanoff L. P., Physics 2, 263, 1966. |
| [13] | Wilson K. G., Phys.Rev. B 4, 3174, 1971. Wilson K. G. and Kogut J., Phys.Rep. 12, 75, 1974 |
| [14] | Wilson K. G., Rev. Mod. Phys. 55, 595, 1983. |
| [15] | Zhi-Dong Zhang, Phil. Mag. B 88, 3097, 2008. |
| [16] | Pascal Monceau, Michel Perreau and Frèdèric Hèbert, Phys. Rev. B 58, 6386, 1998. |
| [17] | Wolfhard Janke and Adriuan M. J. Schakel, Phys. Rev. E 71, 036703, 2005. |
| [18] | Armstrong, M. A., Basic Topology (Springer, New York, 1983) p.119-120, 59- 60. |
| [19] | Chen, S. S., Chen, W. H. and Lam, K. S., Lectures on differential geometry (World scientific, Beijing,1999) p.43-50. |
| [20] | Falconer, K. J., Fractal Geometry Second edition (: John Wiley, Chichester, 2003) p41-43, xxiv. |
| [21] | T. H. Berlin and M. Kac, Phys.Rev. 86, 821, 1952; H. E. Stanley, Phys.Rev. 176, 718, 1968; M. Kac and C. J. Thompson, Physica Norvegica 5, 163, 1971. |
| [22] | Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. M., Quantum mechanics Third edition (Pergamon, Oxford, 1977) p.231. |
| [23] | Jun Kigami, Analysis of fractals (Cambridge University, Cambridge, 2001) p.9. |
| [24] | Kouichi Okonishi and Tomotoshi Nishino, Prog. Theor. Phys. 103, 54, 2000. |
| [25] | H. W. J. Blöte, Erik Luijten, and J. R. Heringa J. Phys. A 28, 6289, 1995. |
| [26] | A. L. Talapov and H. W. J. Blöte, J. Phys. A 29, 5727, 1996. |
| [27] | Tullio Regge and Riccardo Zecchina J.Phys. A 33, 741, 2000. |
| [28] | Pathria, R. K., Statistical mechanics Second edition (Elsevier Pte., Singapore, 2001) p 383 |
| [29] | R. Kubo, Rep. Prog. Phys. 29, 255, 1996. |
| [30] | You-Gang Feng arxiv 1111.2233, You-Gang Feng arxiv 1204.1807 |
APA Style
You-Gang Feng. (2014). Self-Similar Transformations of Lattice-Ising Models at Critical Temperatures. American Journal of Modern Physics, 3(4), 184-194. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20140304.16
ACS Style
You-Gang Feng. Self-Similar Transformations of Lattice-Ising Models at Critical Temperatures. Am. J. Mod. Phys. 2014, 3(4), 184-194. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmp.20140304.16
AMA Style
You-Gang Feng. Self-Similar Transformations of Lattice-Ising Models at Critical Temperatures. Am J Mod Phys. 2014;3(4):184-194. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmp.20140304.16
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajmp.20140304.16,
author = {You-Gang Feng},
title = {Self-Similar Transformations of Lattice-Ising Models at Critical Temperatures},
journal = {American Journal of Modern Physics},
volume = {3},
number = {4},
pages = {184-194},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajmp.20140304.16},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20140304.16},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajmp.20140304.16},
abstract = {We classify geometric blocks that serve as spin carriers into simple blocks and compound blocks by their topologic connectivity, define their fractal dimensions and describe the relevant transformations. By the hierarchical property of transformations and a block-spin scaling law we obtain a relation between the block spin and its carrier’s fractal dimension. By mapping we set up a block-spin Gaussian model and get a formula connecting the critical point and the minimal fractal dimension of the carrier, which guarantees the uniqueness of a fixed point corresponding to the critical point, changing the complicated calculation of critical point into the simple one of the minimal fractal dimension. The numerical results of critical points with high accuracy for five conventional lattice-Ising models prove our method very effective and may be suitable to all lattice-Ising models. The origin of fluctuations in structure at critical temperature is discussed. Our method not only explains the problems met in the renormalization-group theory, but also provides a useful tool for deep investigation of the critical behaviour.},
year = {2014}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Self-Similar Transformations of Lattice-Ising Models at Critical Temperatures AU - You-Gang Feng Y1 - 2014/08/10 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20140304.16 DO - 10.11648/j.ajmp.20140304.16 T2 - American Journal of Modern Physics JF - American Journal of Modern Physics JO - American Journal of Modern Physics SP - 184 EP - 194 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-8891 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20140304.16 AB - We classify geometric blocks that serve as spin carriers into simple blocks and compound blocks by their topologic connectivity, define their fractal dimensions and describe the relevant transformations. By the hierarchical property of transformations and a block-spin scaling law we obtain a relation between the block spin and its carrier’s fractal dimension. By mapping we set up a block-spin Gaussian model and get a formula connecting the critical point and the minimal fractal dimension of the carrier, which guarantees the uniqueness of a fixed point corresponding to the critical point, changing the complicated calculation of critical point into the simple one of the minimal fractal dimension. The numerical results of critical points with high accuracy for five conventional lattice-Ising models prove our method very effective and may be suitable to all lattice-Ising models. The origin of fluctuations in structure at critical temperature is discussed. Our method not only explains the problems met in the renormalization-group theory, but also provides a useful tool for deep investigation of the critical behaviour. VL - 3 IS - 4 ER -
Email: